The new NEWS page now highlights industry developments such as Members in Action, President's Corner and Migrations.  If you have any NEWS items featured here or in Migrations - Contact us today! 

  • 12 Dec 2014 4:24 PM | Anonymous
    With the holiday travel season in full swing, it's a good time to consider expert advice on how best to manage your itinerary. After all, Thanksgiving through New Year's spans some of the busiest days of the year for commercial flying in the United States.

    But for those whose family includes furry members, it's also a good time to consider whether four-legged loved ones should fly at all. It's an issue that has been back in the news in recent weeks, after passenger Frank Romano's dog was lost by Delta Air Lines in Los Angeles on Halloween, allegedly after chewing through a plastic kennel.

    Can some animals travel safely, either in the cabin or the belly of an aircraft? Yes. But it's a more complex issue than many pet owners realize, so a little research can be critical.

    Since I last addressed this issue here in 2009 with "What you need to know about flying with pets," there has been an increase in guidance from animal care experts. There also has been additional evidence of the dangers, with more robust government statistics on animals that have been lost, injured or killed while in the care of U.S. airlines.

    Some pets should not be flying at all -- ever. The American Humane Association advises: "As a general rule, puppies and kittens, sick animals, animals in heat and frail or pregnant animals should not travel by air." Furthermore, the Humane Society of the United States warns "air travel is particularly dangerous for animals with 'pushed-in' faces," such as bulldogs, pugs and Persian cats; some airlines will not accept them.

    In addition, during this holiday season, some regions of the United States will be too cold for pet travel, while other regions will be too hot, making the booking process quite difficult. Minimum and maximum temperature guidelines apply, and they also apply to connecting cities along the way. Last year I assisted some family members who relocated to Central America by shipping their dog to them; although it was a crisp fall day in Newark and not particularly hot at the destination, the airline refused to board the dog because the temperature was soaring in Miami, the connecting hub.

    In fact, there are so many dangers, concerns and nuances involved in flying with pets, three entire columns could be devoted to offering specific advice. So for detailed guidance, consider the experts who created these pages:

    • The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals' Air Travel Tips
    • The Humane Society's Travel Safely
    • The American Humane Association's Traveling
    • The American Veterinary Medical Association's Traveling with Your Pet

    All four of these organizations also provide advice for those who travel by alternate modes, such as car, bus, train and ship.

    It's important to note pet travel policies usually don't apply to service animals, and exceptions may apply for U.S. military and State Department personnel.

    Learning the rules

    First things first: Before you query individual airline policies, you need to review governmental restrictions. The U.S. Department of Transportation provides guidelines on Transporting Live Animals for both owners and shippers at its site. In addition, the Federal Aviation Administration features a Flying with Pets page; it includes critical information on security screening and rules for pets in the passenger cabin.

    For those traveling with pets in foreign countries -- or importing or exporting pets -- there are specific requirements, detailed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. For a rundown on foreign rules, country-by-country regulations are provided by the industry's global trade organization, the International Air Transport Association.

    Once you've addressed all these issues, you'll need to learn the specific policies of the carrier you'll be booking, since they do vary. (So do the perks, such as frequent-flier mileage for four-legged friends.) Each airline has its own rules on which animals it will and will not carry, specific regulations for cabin and belly travel and policies on containers. Of course, in this golden age of airline "ancillary revenue," fees can vary for such services.

    Here are links to more information from the largest domestic carriers:

    US Airways*
    Virgin America

    * In this age of airline consolidation, it's worth noting American specifically states its merger partner US Airways has "different policies on pet travel."

    Grading the airlines

    So how do these domestic airlines perform when it comes to handling your furry fellow travelers? Thankfully, for nearly ten years now U.S. carriers are required to report all incidents to the DOT, and those reports are viewable to the public, though some animal lovers may find them tough reading.

    Although the DOT has been posting such records since May 2005, in the early years it did not summarize the annual findings as it does with all other airline performance categories, such as flight delays and consumer complaints. Currently the annual totals are summarized, and here is how the airlines stacked up in 2013:

    Alaska 0 11 8 19
    American 1 0 1 2
    Delta 0 3 2 5
    Hawaiian 1 0 1 2
    Horizon* 0 1 0 1
    United 4 0 9 13
    TOTAL 6 15 21 42
    * Operates on behalf of Alaska, American and Delta

    U.S. airlines not listed did not report any anomalies last year. However, what remains unclear is the total number of animals carried by each of the airlines, so consumers can't analyze these statistics on a proportional basis. But since the totals for Alaska and United are so significantly higher than for all other domestic airlines, it can be instructional to view the detailed incident reports linked above.

    A few last words ...

    The sites listed above can address most of your questions about flying with pets. But consider this:

    • The first step always is checking with your veterinarian to see if your pet is healthy enough to fly.

    • For those seeking to transport a pet without accompanying it, the International Pet and Animal Transportation Association offers pet owners advice on finding pet shippers, as well as warnings about pet scams.

    • By the way, some well-meaning sites suggest you book a "direct flight," not realizing that in airline-speak direct flights make stops en route; ideally, you'll want to book a "nonstop flight," though this may not be possible in many cases. It's also important to know if all legs of an itinerary will be operated by the same carrier or a codeshare partner, particularly since so many domestic routes today are serviced by regional partners.

    Full story here:

  • 12 Dec 2014 4:23 PM | Anonymous
    Lufthansa has offered a glimpse into its latest offering for wealthy, bird-loving clientele - an in-flight resting platform for falcons. It will allow passengers to fly right next to their precious, feathery companions.
    Falconry in Dubai

    It's called the "Falcon Master," and it's changing the way people - and birds - fly.

    On Monday, the German carrier Lufthansa's technology division announced that it had devised a contraption to transport falcons in the passenger deck of commercial jets. It is a resting platform for falcons that Lufthansa's engineers claim can be installed on folded-down seats.

    The construction of the platform would be such that surrounding walls, seats and carpets would not be harmed by whatever the birds would think of doing during flights. Plus, Lufthansa said, a lot of Airbus and Boeing aircraft would already qualify for the transport of falcons.

    The airline pointed out that falconry is an extremely popular activity in some countries, predominantly in the Gulf. Lufthansa's "Falcon Master" platform would enable a small, but no doubt affluent group of clients to take their birds on board and not lose sight of them during flights.

    And once the flight is over, the "Falcon Master" can be quickly disassembled and stowed away in lightweight containers.

    Full story here:

  • 12 Dec 2014 4:22 PM | Anonymous
    Five of Napier's last Marineland mammals have taken their one-way trip to Australia.

    Californian sea lions Dakota and Orion, New Zealand fur seals Iha and Ollie, and sub-Antarctic fur seal Mako flew out of Auckland on a commercial Air New Zealand flight yesterday morning.

    The historic marine centre's last eight animals began their 120-day pre-export quarantine period in August.

    Napier City Council staff prepared a thorough transport management plan and selected Mainfreight to co-ordinate the move.

    The mammals travelled from their Marine Pde home to Hawke's Bay Airport on Tuesday evening. They were boarded on to a New Zealand Airforce Hercules.

    The Airforce stepped in to help the council because no commercial flights from Napier were big enough to carry the animals' travelling crates to Auckland International Airport. A road trip would have added several hours to their journey, a council spokeswoman said.

    Four keepers accompanied the animals on their flight across the Tasman. The animals were given no food or water while in transit. All the animals can survive for up to several days without food or water but these animals went without for less than 24 hours.

    Senior keeper Regan Beckett was happy the animals were going to quality homes, and that they would be in "caring and capable hands".

    Iha is going to Melbourne Zoo, Ollie is going to Taronga Zoo, and the other three are headed for Sea World at Surfers' Paradise.

    "I don't feel we're saying goodbye to them, I'm sure we'll meet again as Australia isn't that far away. We look forward to hearing of how they are after our departure and in the future," Beckett said.

    The animals will spend 30 days going through Australian quarantine before they can go to their new homes. Each animal has been micro chipped so that blood tests for unwanted viruses and disease can be accurately recorded.

    Molly, Mr Bo and Pania are due to leave Marineland in March next year. Their trip has been delayed due to Sea World having commitments to other animal imports, and Melbourne only being able to quarantine one animal at a time.

    The flights will cost the council $47,000.

    Full story here:

  • 12 Dec 2014 4:19 PM | Anonymous
    The European Commission took action Dec. 8 that resulted in the ban of horse meat imports and meat products from Mexico.

    Effective Jan. 15, the commission has suspended a residue monitoring plan that tests for the presence of horse meat in other imported meat products, according to Aikaterini Apostola, press officer for health for the European Commission.

    "Such suspension results in a ban of the import of horse meat, meat preparations, and meat products from Mexico," Apostola stated in an email. "The measure has been taken after repeated negative outcomes of the audits carried out by the Food and Veterinary Office of the Commission's Health and Consumers Directorate General in Mexico, the last of them in June 2014. This last audit also showed that many of the corrective actions that Mexico committed to take following previous audits were not yet taken."

    A key issue for the 28-member commission was inhumane treatment of the horses being shipped from the United States to Mexican slaughterhouses.
    Michael Scannell, director of the Food and Veterinary Office, addressed the issue Nov. 30 at a European Parliament Intergroup meeting in Brussels.

    "In general, the worst contraventions we know are in relation to transport," Scannell said. "By way of example, we will publish a report in the next number of weeks in relation to Mexico where we saw animals which arrived dead from the United States or non-ambulatory, i.e., they weren't even able to stand."

    The transportation problem is also expected to affect slaughter operations in Canada, according to Scannell, who added the commission is close to imposing a "six-month" rule for Canada.

    "So, in both cases, this will make it a lot more difficult -- impossible in the case of Mexico, difficult in the case of Canada -- to continue importing horses from the United States for subsequent export of horse meat to the European Union," Scannell said.

    Wayne Pacelle, president and CEO of The Humane Society of the United States, called the decision "the biggest blow" to horse slaughter since his organization led an effort in 2007 to shut down three horse slaughter plants in the United States.

    "Mexico not only kills thousands of its horses for export to the EU, but accepts tens of thousands of American horses for slaughter and shipment to Europe," Pacelle wrote on his blog. "This announcement could prove to be an earthquake for the North American horse slaughter industry, since Belgium, France, Italy, and other EU nations are major consumers."

    Ineffective testing was another issue that led to the European Commission ban, according to Apostola.

    "The 2014 audit confirms that the reliability of the guarantees on horse identification, traceability, and medicinal treatment history remain very weak," Apostola wrote. "Due to these problems in the official controls, it cannot be excluded that unauthorized substances might be used in horses slaughtered in Mexico for the export of their meat to the EU."

    Scannell also noted in his presentation that the slaughtering process itself was "by and large acceptable."

    "It is quite a lucrative trade and the establishments concerned know that they are under an awful lot of pressure, and that they are being very closely watched," he said. "One of things they can control relatively well is slaughtering conditions, and by and large what we see is acceptable."

    Apostola noted the suspension could be reversed if Mexican authorities are able to provide sufficient guarantees.

    "A future FVO audit which has a satisfactory outcome will also be necessary before any proposal to lift the ban," Apostola wrote.

    Full story here:

  • 05 Dec 2014 4:17 PM | Anonymous
    Avian influenza has been detected at two poultry operations in the Canadian province of British Columbia, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) reported.

    The affected operations include a turkey farm in Abbotsford and a broiler breeding facility in Chilliwack. The two farms are about eight kilometers away from each other.

    Preliminary tests show the virus found is of the H5 variety, according to Dr. Harpreet Kochhar, chief veterinary officer with the CFIA, but the exact serotype is not known at this time.

    The source of the avian influenza outbreaks has yet to be identified, said Kochhar.

    Of the nearly 11,000 turkeys at the Abbotsford operation, about half have died. The farm in Chilliwack is the home of about 7,000 birds, with an estimated 1,000 having died. Culling efforts will be conducted with the remaining susceptible birds at both properties, and quarantines have been established.

    The CFIA will also lead on required depopulation of birds, while the Province of British Columbia will provide technical support on required carcass disposal. Once all birds have been removed, the CFIA will oversee the cleaning and disinfection of the barns, vehicles, equipment and tools to eliminate any infectious material that may remain.

    The government entities, the owners of the infected birds, and the Canadian poultry industry are working together to manage the situation, stated Chicken Farmers of Canada. Both levels of government will work with the poultry industry to address issues as they emerge.

    Avian influenza has been a big source of concern for the global poultry industry in recent months, as outbreaks have also been confirmed in The Netherlands, U.K., Germany, India and Japan.

    Full story here:

  • 05 Dec 2014 4:16 PM | Anonymous
    The International Federation for Animal Health has launched a white paper on vector borne diseases and their impact on animal and human health, with the support of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The paper, which aims to assist in combating vector borne diseases to promote the better health and welfare of animals for the greater good of protecting animals and humans globally, emphasises the need to understand the diseases and to spread awareness of the most effective ways of managing and preventing them.

    Vector borne diseases account for 17% of global infectious diseases with malaria the most deadly, causing an estimated 627,000 deaths annually. VBDs cause high human morbidity levels as well as large economic losses in animal production - trypanosomiasis accounts for losses of $1.2 billion a year in cattle production - and reduced animal welfare. Most statistics regarding the impact of VBDs are hard to track because cases predominantly occur in countries with little means of formal reporting or surveillance, poor diagnostic tools and consequently there is little accurate assessment of the economic impact of these diseases. The IFAH's paper looks to close the gaps in knowledge of VBDs and present solutions for combating the problem.

    Global animal health is set to be impacted for years to come as the IFAH reports the difficulties in combating diseases that are constantly changing, affected by climate change which influences vector spread and habitat change by humans introducing wetlands or changing their patters of the transportation of goods, humans, livestock, and companion animals. The most influential and dangerous factor limiting the prevention of vector borne disease is insecticide resistance and farmers must be aware of the need to manage the spread of VBDs through a combination of insecticides and physical barriers.

    Efforts to combat VBDs must understand that their eradication is not realistic; farmers must learn to prevent their spreading where they can through vaccinations and focus on controlling the spreading of the disease by efforts to reduce the populations of the vector and by making modifications to the environment that make it less conducive to the vector's survival. The establishment of effective surveillance systems and the collection of accurate data will also be important in moving forward to protect global animal health. Global animal health market

    Pharmaceutical companies wanting to develop products to help combat vector borne disease face a difficult market place. Governments and funding agencies are unwilling to invest in a market place with unproven necessity or success but the discoveries, screening and testing processes of treatments are all expensive and time consuming and the lack of support for pharmaceutical companies is not conducive to the need to focus on prevention of VBDs by vaccine, as outlined in the IFAH paper.

    The animal health market includes pharmaceuticals, vaccines and medicinal food additives and pharmaceutical companies are significant contributors to the health and well-being of food-production and companion animals. The management of vector borne diseases is vital to the protection of the global animal health market, and there must be an influx of funding to pharmaceutical companies if farmers are to be more successful at managing these animal-health-harming diseases.

    Full story here:

  • 05 Dec 2014 4:12 PM | Anonymous
    Feeding chicks while in transport is a controversial topic, but under certain conditions it can offer benefits, especially in terms of early survivability.

    Nature has provided for nutrients and water to be readily available for the newly hatched chick in the form of remaining egg yolk sac that is slowly absorbed in the first hours of life. The absorption of these vital nutrients is of paramount importance for the correct functioning and health of the gut, and it speeds up as the chick starts picking up normal feed from its environment. But, commercial practice often interferes with nature.

    As long as chicks are placed under brooders within 24 hours post-hatch, they can manage without any further help, assuming the pre-starter feed available is of suitable quality and it is readily accessible by all chicks. But, if chicks are to remain in their transport trays for a prolonged period of time, then the normal life cycle is impaired.

    As long as chicks are placed under brooders within 24 hours post-hatch, they can manage without any further help.

    Transporting chicks to long distances, especially under adverse conditions, will first dehydrate them and then deprive them of body energy reserves. In result, upon placement, they will be exhausted, and at best, they will take longer to pick up feed and water -- with subsequent negative effects on growth performance. At worst case scenario, mortality will spike.

    Thus, when chicks are to be kept in transport cases for too long, it is advisable to use some form of nourishment and hydration. Several methods of doing so are available:

    1. Provide a gel that sticks to walls and provides both water and some nutrients. The only negative side, apart from the cost, is that chicks farthest away from the gel will not benefit from it as much those close to the supplement.
    2. Provide a regular diet, in powder form, at the bottom of the tray. This ensures all chicks have access to feed, but it does not solve the problem of water, unless special trays are used to provide water; something seldom convenient.
    3. Provide a slice of watermelon or pumpkin in the transport box. This is an easy and inexpensive way of providing both nutrients and water, but it is not as practical as a ready-made commercial product. But, it works and it is used by small hatcheries.
    On placement, some experts advise keeping chicks on a water-only diet for a few hours. Adding some sugar and electrolytes in the water is considered beneficial, especially for dehydrated chicks after a long trip to the rearing facility. Certain other additives may be considered in hot climates, or if chicks are expected to be affected by certain enteric disorders. Following this gut cleansing diet that also rehydrates the birds, it is recommended to offer them a high quality pre-starter feed to help them catch up quickly.

    In general, for normal practices, when chicks are not expected to be kept long from placement, there is little if any benefit of doing anything in terms of early feeding. Normal procedures will suffice, or the extra cost will not be paid back by enhanced performance. But, when adverse conditions prevail, providing extra care and nourishment will help chicks withstand the rigors of transportation, and even if they don’t grow any faster, at least mortality spikes will be avoided. In most cases, this is enough to pay back for the extra investment in materials and labor. At the end, what works for each hatchery and rearing facility is a combination of actual procedures, available means, and above all cost over profit.

    Full story here:

  • 05 Dec 2014 4:10 PM | Anonymous
    The Jihlava zoo at last succeeded, on the fourth try, in delivering a rare snow leopard to a partner zoo in India today, after three unsuccessful attempts when the transfer was thwarted by unexpected obstacles, the zoo's spokeswoman Kateřina Kosová told ČTK.

    Fici, the three-year-old leopard male, was raised in Jihlava and he was to leave for Calcutta on April 9 to reinforce the snow leopard population in India's Padmaja Naidu Himalayan Zoological Park.

    "Today we've been informed that the snow leopard has reached India at last," Kosová said.

    On April 9, Fici's planned departure from Jihlava was cancelled in the last moment over the Indian partner's refusal to take the animal over in the evening hours.

    Another date of departure was set for April 14, when a van with Fici set out from Jihlava for the Prague airport, some 120 km far westwards. However, the D1 motorway was jammed due to ongoing repairs, which delayed the van and Fici missed his flight.

    "On the third try, the leopard arrived in Prague but the air carrier's staff returned him to us because they disliked his transport box," Kosová said.
    She said Fici was traveling in a box which the zoo had used to transport animals many times before.

    Similar problems are a rarity in the Jihlava zoo, Kosová said, adding that Fici is not the first leopard the zoo has delivered abroad.

    Nevertheless, previously the animals have left mainly for European zoos, including Moscow, Poland and Britain. It is for the first time that one has departed for India, she said.

    The Jihlava zoo is the Czech leader in breeding snow leopards. It has kept the species since 1992, since when a total of 18 kittens have been born there. Now it has four adult and one young leopards.

    The snow leopard figures on the list of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), under which animals are exchanged between zoos and salvation centers free of charge.

    Read more:
  • 05 Dec 2014 4:08 PM | Anonymous
    There's some great news for Leon - or Leona - the loggerhead turtle, who will finally be jetting off to her new home next week.

    According to RTÉ News, the Irish Whale and Dolphin Group (IWDG) has arranged special transport with Aer Lingus for the turtle, who spent much of this year being nursed back to health by Galway Atlantaquaria staff after she was found beached at Quilty in Co Clare last November.

    Plans were made to relocate her to the much more hospitable climes of the Canary Islands last month, but safe transport was a stumbling block, prompting the IWDG to put out a call earlier this month for berthage on a private jet.

    But thanks to the intervention of Dublin Zoo, Galway Atlantaquaria and Rod Penrose of the UK Cetacean Strandings Investigation Programme, suitable travel arrangements have been made with Are Lingus to fly the turtle - with two carers - direct to Las Palmas, from where her future exploits in the wild can be followed online.

    Full story here:

  • 05 Dec 2014 4:06 PM | Anonymous
    As millions of Americans cram into coach for holiday travel, some four-legged passengers will fly on luxury private jets.

    A rebound in U.S. business-aircraft trips this year means more dogs and cats are taking wing too. In addition to the perks of on-demand flights and plenty of legroom, being able to bring furry companions onboard can justify the price of a ticket, which doesn’t come cheap.

    A flight on Jet Edge International costs $67,000 on average, and the company also charges a $2,000 refundable pet deposit in case of accidents on board. The average net worth of the company’s customers is $1 billion, according to Chief Executive Officer Bill Papariella.

    Letting animals tag along is “one of the main reasons why people will fly private,” Papariella said in an interview. “They don’t want to go to Aspen or their holiday or to their second home without their pets being on board.”

    For those with means, a charter flight or a jet with fractional ownership is an attractive alternative to airlines’ limits on carry-on kennels or the risks of sending a crated pet in the hold. It’s a niche market that can include handmade dog snacks -- a $1,000 Kobe beef snack or rice pilaf with salmon -- special attendants and even solo flights without an animal’s owner.

    It was worth it for Dallas real estate investor Alan Box, whose purchase of a one-fourth interest in a Learjet via leasing company Flexjet a decade ago was driven chiefly by a desire to ensure that family members could enjoy getaways to their ranch in Crowheart, Wyoming, with canines in tow.

    Big Dogs

    Box, 63, was living in Fairfax County, Virginia, at the time as CEO of radio-station chain EZ Communications. Commercial flight connections through Denver and Jackson Hole, Wyoming, would have been impossible with Ribsy and Cody, his full-grown chocolate and black Labrador Retrievers.

    “We just thought they were too big,” said Box, who has since sold the jet share because he didn’t replace his pets when they died. “We didn’t feel like it was safe or really worth the trouble,” to fly commercial, he said.

    Dogs Welcome

    NetJets Inc., the luxury-jet unit of Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc, probably flew pets on about 9 percent of last year’s flights, according to figures from spokeswoman Christine Herbert and the website of the Columbus, Ohio-based company. Boston-based Magellan Jets estimates that it carries animals on a quarter of its trips, while at Jet Edge the share is about half.

    As with two-legged passengers, the holidays tend to be the busiest time for animals as well. The post-Thanksgiving Sunday is “our highest-volume day of the year,” Herbert said.

    While private-jet operations still aren’t back at pre-recession levels, flights are up in 2014 as an improving U.S. economy and surging corporate profits buoy business and personal travel. This year is poised to be the busiest for such trips since 2008, based on U.S. Federal Aviation Administration data through September.

    A perception of safety is one of the reasons some people opt to upgrade their pets. Fifteen animals died on U.S. airline flights this year through August, down from 18 in the same period in 2013, according to U.S. Transportation Department data. And travel rules on commercial flights are poised to tighten this week, when American Airlines Group Inc. (AAL) starts requiring that pets on connecting flights be routed through one of five U.S. cities.

    Goats, Pigs?

    Airlines’ restrictions ensure that few travelers ever see a dog or cat on board.

    American, for example, limits carry-on pets to a maximum of seven containers per flight, excluding service animals. Size limits on the kennels -- 19 inches (48.3 centimeters) long by 13 inches wide by 9 inches high -- rule out larger breeds. On private planes, pets can roam free for the duration of the flight as there are no industry-wide safety rules for non-human passengers.

    Usually only dogs and cats are allowed on commercial flights, which means owners of barnyard animal-companions must make other arrangements. Emotional-support animals are allowed, but only if they are not disorderly. A woman and her pet pig were escorted off a US Airways flight out of Connecticut last week after the animal befouled the plane and was running in the aisle, according to reports from the Hartford Courant and USA Today.

    “I have a client in Dubai who flies me down there to fly with him and his goat a few times a year,” said Carol Martin, the founder of Carmel, California-based Sit ’n Stay Global, which supplies pet-friendly flight attendants and “pawmenity” kits that include custom snacks.

    The goat owner likes to have fresh milk and has a pen at the back of his private plane for that purpose, said Martin.

    Divorce Casualty

    While Magellan passengers have brought along exotic birds, gerbils and hamsters, the typical private-jet-flying animal is a dog joining its owners on a family vacation, Chief Executive Officer Joshua Hebert said in an interview. Jet Edge has one celebrity athlete client who likes to have his German shepherd on all of his trips, domestic and international, CEO Papariella said.

    The rarest transports are for animals traveling without an owner, perhaps the result of a couple splitting up while retaining joint custody of a pet.

    “They fly the pet back and forth and they want a nanny on board,” Martin said. One such former couple pays about $50,000 per trip to fly their dog from Los Angeles to New York every other month.

    “A couple times a year, we get the passenger manifest and I realize, ‘Oh my God, all there is is a dog on this plane,’’ Jet Edge’s Papariella said. ‘‘Holy cow, this person is actually paying for their pet to go somewhere.’’

    To contact the reporter on this story: Jennifer Kaplan in New York at

    To contact the editors responsible for this story: Ed Dufner at Molly Schuetz

    Full story here:

2017 Animal Transportation Association (ATA)
20431 Cherrystone Place, Ashburn, VA  20147 USA
(P) + 1 202.676.7077
Contact us at

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software